Paul was a brilliant scholar. Muhammad wasn’t. This is quite relevant because Muhammad claimed that the reliability of a person’s testimony is proportional to the person’s intellectual ability.
This video is the second comparison in David Wood’s “Paul vs. Muhammad” series.
PATREON: David Wood is creating EPIC videos | Patreon
TWITTER: https://twitter.com/Acts17
FACEBOOK: Facebook
MINDS: Acts17Apologetics (@Acts17Apologetics) | Minds
WEBSITE: http://www.acts17.net
#Paul #Muhammad #PaulVsMuhammad
Scientific errors in Quran debunked:-
- Sun setting in a muddy spring:-
The verb used in the verse is “wajadaha” which means that “he found her”, as the translation also says, further he word used is “maghrib ulshamas” which means “maghrib of Sun”, As David Wood is researching Islam for 20 years he might know that the first prayer that Muslims pray at “the time of” sunset is “maghrib” prayer so “maghrib” can also mean “setting time” and thus the translation would be the setting time of sun, ie. sunset.
It also is logical because even if Dhul Qarnayn reached the setting place of Sun it would not have been necessarily setting at that time because he could have reached at noon or morning when the sun would have been riding.David Wood would say “it is a coincidence” but the next verse say that Dhul Qarnayn saw the sun rising from its rising place(the word rising place can also mean rising time or sunrise) so it cannot be a double coincidence.
So the verse says that Dhul Qarnayn reached a place at sunset and saw the sun setting in a murky spring and God is explaining the perspective of Dhul Qarnayn not the reality as one can say that I found written on the board that 1+1=4 but that does not mean that 1+1=4 the speaker is explaining what he saw not what is a reality just as when we see the sun reusing we say that the sun rise from the east but does sun really rise or does it rise from east. No we are just explaining our first impression.
Furthermore there are no classical Hadith(saying of Muhammad) and Tafsir(exegesis) material to support your claim.
Well, I would trust a word of a scientist more than a word of a retard.
Q. Who is the world best man?
Google. Prophet Muhammad the greatest man(ﷺ) was born in Saudi Arabia in the city of Makkah about 1400 years ago. Since then the world has not seen the likes of Him in every regard and the study of human history shows that there have been none better than Him before Him as well.
Jesus convinced and converted through love, not through ridicule and sarcasm. These just make people on the receiving end more defensive.
Why compare Muhammad with Paul? Better to compare Him with Jesus. A prophet is different from a scholar. Better to compare Paul with an early Muslim scholar.
I feel personally attacked by the Google search LOL
In all honesty, I’d trust some Google searches more the “a fair few” of Ph.Ds, especially if that Ph.D is in some kind of _____ Studies program.
I found you with a google search.
I have no doctoral degree, i just goggle search LOL
At least the internet troll doing the Google search could read, Muhammad couldn’t even do that.
I am still laughing at the “bleeding railroad” great reference.
Great, somebody translated on my Croatian language. 
ohh i know now why he was married to 9 wives. islam says just 4. so dividing 9÷2 is 4.5. so we get 4 wives n a slave girl.since he said a woman can not b fully accepted on her own. 2 for 1😉
I want to get a PhD JUST so I can get that mug…EPIC!
Love your work David, keep it up!
